Collaborative Studies of Significant Events


POLAR/SuperDARN Boundary Mapping and Dynamics
Headed by John R. Dudeney, British Antarctic Survey, Upper Atmospheric Sciences Division, Cambridge, UK (J.Dudeney@bas.ac.uk)
Official ISTP Event Status Pending

Event Description:
This event is chosen to study the mapping of particle, wave, field and emission boundaries from POLAR to the Halley SuperDARN radar Field of View for a nightside period when Bz is strongly positive. POLAR has its perigee in the south with the ground track traversing equatorward to poleward through the radar FOV from 2330 UT to 2355 on 28 May. The radar records a stable backscatter feature with a distinct boundary picked out in the spectral width. This boundary is associated with boundaries in waves, particles and E on POLAR. The backscatter region overlaps the region of luminosity observed by VIS field camera. Later (around 03 to 04UT on 29 May) there is a sharp step in the Scatter boundary in the noon midnight plane - possibly associated with BX,By changes. This latter period shows how the nightside is reconfiguring whilst POLAR is flying through the reconnection region on the northern dayside.

Relevant Hydra/DDEIS Spectrogram for May 28, 1996
(Click here for full-sized image)

Observations of Theta Auroras
Headed by Shen-Wu Chang, Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 swc@space-theory.physics.uiowa.edu and in collaboration with: J. D. Scudder, L. A. Frank, J. B. Sigwarth (all at: The University of Iowa), J. B. Blake (The Aerospace Corporation), R. Friedel (Max-Planck-Institut fur Aeronomie), E. G. Shelley, W. K. Peterson (both at: Lockheed Martin Space Sciences Laboratory), R. A. Greenwald (Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory), and R. P. Lepping (Goddard Space Flight Center)

Event Description:
It is frequently observed by the HYDRA instrument on-board Polar spacecraft that enhanced fluxes of hot electrons and ions appear in the middle of the polar cap, isolated from the cusp/mantle and the auroral oval particles. These particles are characterized as plasma sheet plasmas with ion average energies above 1 keV and electron energies much higher than the values in the polar cap. They often associate with the transpolar arcs in the theta-auroral patterns at the ionosphere height, confirmed by the auroral images from the VIS Earth Camera. An example of such events in the northern hemisphere can be found on 96/11/01. HYDRA observed plasma sheet like electrons and ions at 2:30, 4:10, 4:55, and 5:15 UT near the pole while Polar was traveling from midnight to noon. Also, in the southern hemisphere on 96/05/07, they were observed at 1:09 UT. Moreover, when HYDRA observes such enhanced plasmas within the polar cap, TIMAS and CEPPAD IPS instruments also observe ions of different compositions and much higher energies, respectively. Usually, the IMF By and/or Bz components change sign before the theta-auroral patterns develop. However, they sometimes do not appear in the same configuration suggested by Newell and Meng [1995].

HYDRA/DDEIS Spectrogram on November 1, 1996
(Click here for full-sized image)

HYDRA/DDEIS Spectrogram on May 7, 1996
(Click here for full-sized image)

Hydra Observations of Pulsed Dayside Reconnection
Headed by Terry Onsager, NOAA Space Environment Center, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80303 (tonsager@sec.noaa.gov) and in collaboration with: M Lockwood, J D Scudder, A Korth, H J Singer, F S Mozer and R P Lepping

Event Description:
Observations from Hydra and from the Electric Field Experiment are being used to investigate the direct entry of magnetosheath plasma into the LLBL, the cusp, and the mantle. The entering magnetosheath plasma is observed to have large-scale variability, over time scales of tens of minutes, and small-scale variability, over time scales of several minutes. The large-scale structure consists of multiple entries and exits from the dispersed cusp ions that are expected to result from variations in the dayside reconnection rate. These entries and exits are seen to correspond to variations in the southward component of the interplanetary magnetic field observed by the WIND MFI instrument. Superimposed on the large-scale variability is a small-scale structure in the particle dispersion that similarly is consistent with variations in the reconnection rate.

Relevant Hydra/DDEIS Spectrogram and WIND data for May 20, 1996
(Click here for full-sized image)


Identifying Particles that Travel Between Spacecraft
Elden C. Whipple and Jasper S. Halekas, Geophysics Department, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98011

We are interested in identifying charged particles that travel between pairs of spacecraft. If such particles can be identified, then they can be used for a number of geophysical investigations. We have been looking at a magnetically quiet period from 1700-1900 UT on August 19, 1996, with the aim of finding the magnetospheric electrostatic potential difference between the locations of the Polar and Geotail spacecraft.

We make use of the fact that magnetospheric magnetic field models are in much better shape than electric field models. We are using the Tsyganenko 96 magnetic field model to calculate the change in pitch-angle (PA) of particles seen by each spacecraft as a function of distance (s) along the field lines going through each spacecraft. We also calculate the modified longitudinal invariant K(s). Imagine a particle at some PA travelling up the field line from Polar. When its PA reaches 90 degrees it mirrors, but the particle mirror point stays on a constant K surface as the particle drifts from one field line to another. If a particle reaches the field line of Geotail, we know from its value of K what the value of B is at its mirror point, and therefore what its PA will be at Geotail which is at some other point on that field line.

Since the magnetic moment (mu) and longitudinal invariant (K) are conserved during the particle motion, we can use particle data from each spacecraft to compare measured phase space densities as a function of (mu, K). Liouville's theorem tell us that (with no scattering) the phase space densities (f) should be equal for particles seen at both spacecraft. We are using Hydra data on Polar and CPI data on Geotail. We hunt for matches in f knowing that such a match should have a characteristic shape in the (mu, K) plane. The difference in energy of the particles as seen at the two spacecraft is a measure of the potential difference between the two regions, and should be the same along the matched f(mu, K). We are also looking at electric field data from the two spacecraft (EFI and EFD) to see if the potential differences that we infer are consistent with their measured electric fields. We also make use of the magnetic field data on each spacecraft (MFE and MGF).

The figure illustrates how a particle from Polar spirals up the field-line (in blue), then how its mirror point drifts (purple curve) across to the Geotail field line, and then spirals down the Geotail field line to the Geotail spacecraft.

Relevant Figure
(Click here for full-sized image)